Title/Year: Clockwork Orange 1971
Director/Birth Country/Year Born: Stanley Kubrick/ New York/
1928
Budget: $2,200,000
Gross: $26,589,355
Synopsis: A group a
young men terrorize the streets of Britain committing horrible crimes such as
theft, rape, and murder. Eventually, Alex, the leader of the gang is
arrested and convicted of his crimes.
While in prison he learns of an experimental social program that alters
the habits of the brain to detest violence and any other acts that are deemed
unsavory. Volunteers receive remuneration through reduced sentences. Alex
completes the program and is released back into the public, though the side
effects of the experiments prove to be a little more than what he bargained
for.
Narrative and Visual Keywords: Gangs, futuristic 1970’s,
rape, revenge, bowler hats, cod pieces, ultra-violence, Britain.
Characterization/ Dialogue: The Story is told through the
point of view of Alex. We are privy to his feeling and thoughts as we hear
several narrative monologues throughout the film. The dialogue is stylized in a British street
slang vernacular. This lends to a cavalier attitude when talking about grave
matters such as murder and rape. This
gives us insight to the lack of compassion Alex and his cronies actually feel.
Camera/lighting/editing technique: The camera moves play a large role within the
presentation of this film. One of the most iconic scenes from the film is the
opening. We start off with a close up of Alex, as the camera dolly’s back we
see that he is stationed with his friends around a table inside some sort of
nightclub. As the Dolly continues to move back we catch other strange things
such as mannequins posed in erotic positions, some of which are used to
dispense milk out of their breast. It is
an effective scene in the sense that as the viewer become more uncomfortable as
more of the surroundings are revealed.
Political/ Social Commentary : see below
Historical Relevance/ Recognition: There are no opening
credits after the title, which is followed by the opening shot of Alex the
Droog. Although it is now commonplace for major films to not have opening
credits, in 1971 it was considered rather unusual and was considered a
trademark of director Stanley Kubrick (IMDB).
Notable Collaboration: A Clockwork Orange is based off the
1962 novel “A Clockwork Orange” by Anthony Burgess.
Random fact, Etc: Malcolm McDowell and Stanley Kubrick
played a lot of Ping Pong on the set of A Clockwork Orange; Stanley Kubrick
became sort of obsessed with the game trying desperately to beat Malcolm
McDowell. Before the end of production He never did according to Malcolm
McDowell.
Why is the film
considered controversial? Where was it banned?
The film was banned in Britain after being pulled by Stanley
Kubrick himself. During the years prior to its release, violent crimes had been
on the rise in Britain and other parts of the UK. A Clockwork Orange came out
at just the right time to ruffle feathers about the subject. Maurice Edelman,
the Labor MP for Coventry West and co-chairman of the All-Party Film Committee
was quoted for saying this.
“The film
stimulates for two and a half hours an appetite for sadistic violence with the instantaneous
communication which the visual arts uniquely offer...I believe that when 'A Clockwork Orange' is generally released,
it will lead to a Clockwork
cult which will magnify teenage violence (Bugge). ”
What societal
"comfort zones" does it push the limit of?
Surely as mentioned
above, the limit’s of acceptable violence that was considered viewable was in
jeopardy. Certain parties were concerned that the film would spark with youths
a romanticism to emulate the behavior of Alex and his droogs.
Would it still be
considered controversial if it were released today?
I believe it would still be controversial. Any material in
which glorifies the behaviors that we as a society have deemed ill fit, will
always be controversial. Though I don’t think that it would ban from viewing if
it were released today.
Do you feel the
director's choice to show the material is ethically sound?
I don’t think ethics had anything to do with his decisions
in the way of how the material was presented. Stanly Kubrick chose to make a
movie based of the story by Anthony Burgess; I believe Kubrick’s ethics were
based more around being true to the author’s original material rather than the
moral aspects of the story.
Would you recommend
this film to a friend?
Instead of recommending this film, I would probably give
them a synopsis of what the movie is about, without any spoilers. I would speak
of the finer points that this film has to offer along with a disclaimer
revolving the subject matter. This would allow a person to decide for himself
or herself whether it is something they would choose to watch.
Citation:
1. Bugge, Christian. "The Clockwork Controversy."
Visual Memory.co. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Feb 2012.
<http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/doc/0012.html>.
2. Nikki Carlyle "A
Clockwork Orange ", Internet Movie Database. IMDB, n.d. Web. 22 Jan 2012. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066921/
No comments:
Post a Comment